EBb and Flow
The "Patriarch of the Library", the Encyclopaedia Britannica, is ceasing its print run. To be quite honest, I was actually not surprised by the announcement.
We used to have tomes of the 14th edition in our home library, and despite its sheer size and overwhelming bits of text, I was comfortable with using it at an early age. Of course, even at the time, I would be careful about the content: I know very well that I wouldn't be able to visit the Soviet Union anymore nor that the capital of the Philippines was the city of stars, Quezon City. (By the way, Britannica actually listed Baguio as one of the capitals of the Philippines in its Micropaedia entry at one point in its publication. I suppose this is still partially true, as the Supreme Court still holds summer sessions in Baguio, but I digress.)
By the time I was in highschool, electronic encyclopedias were in vogue. But Britannica, despite being one of the most respected print publications, was arguably never as popular as Microsoft's Encarta. Encarta in my opinion, simply had a more cohesive user experience. Still, the alure of having the complete text of the Britannica was still there even if it was stored in flimsy disks. Then came along Wikipedia, and the rest is history.
In the course of its history, the Britannica has always been scrutinized by experts. Perhaps the most (in)famous one was a study conducted by Nature in 2005, where it was revealed that on the average, Wikipedia had four errors comparable to Britannica's three when it came to science articles. Not to mention, the wiki was also more accessible, had a greater coverage, and yes, it's free. So it must have been quite a surprise to some, when in 2009, the Britannica was ranked among the ten top consumer brands in Britain. Whatever the reason is, I am inclined to believe that this was caused by affinity of Britons to the brand itself. Britannica, with all the claims of inaccuracy and irrelevance withstanding, remains a brand people associate with great credibility and quality in the midst of a changing information landscape. Or perhaps, it just carried their name.
I do not mourn the loss of the print edition. It had a good run.

